Manufacturer / brand review
Peptidology provides a historical BPC-157 document bundle with useful assay results, but the separate sample identifiers limit a combined interpretation.
Inspected sample results
Vendor-hosted TrustPointe report SPL-0359, published 8 February 2025: BPC-157 purity 99.416%, assay 11.23 mg against a 10 mg label; client ID BPC 10mg 120008. A different sample, SPL-0360 / client ID 120009, reports a sterility pass on 21 February 2025. These are separate samples. The bundle does not demonstrate a single sample passing both tests.
Testing methods and purification
The February 2025 bundle attributes assay, chromatographic purity and identity controls to TrustPointe Analytics (TM-1006), alongside separate microbiological documentation. Distinct sample identifiers cannot be treated as one comprehensive vial test.
How often is testing performed?
One historical report bundle was inspected. No complete public sequence of production lots or fixed retesting interval was established.
What remains unverified
Request matched sample and lot identifiers across purity, quantity, sterility and endotoxin reports. Explanatory claims that purity alone establishes pharmaceutical grade are not accepted.
Catalogue snapshot
Examples from the linked source, not a complete or real-time stock list. Institutional entries describe service categories. Shipping to Cyprus is not verified.
Why this score?
Points reward evidence maturity, not measured product purity. Claim-only points are limited; unknown criteria remain zero. Full rules are available in Research guidesBusiness decision guidesour methodology.
Verification limits
Lab attribution: TrustPointe Analytics (report attribution). A laboratory-hosted record, where explicitly identified, was inspected on the lab’s portal. No direct staff confirmation, blind purchase, independent sampling or full current-batch audit was performed by Peptide.cy. Absence of a recorded test is not proof of contamination.
Public claims about purification cost, manufacturing location or certifications are not treated as proof of a clean final product. An authenticated COA would still apply only to its identified sample.
Follow the evidence
Sources accessed 10 September 2026. Vendor claims and vendor-hosted reports are identified as such.
Peptidology customer reviews & ratings
Loading published experiences…
Share your experience
Rate communication, documentation and service. Explain what happened and when. Customer opinions are separate from our evidence score. All submissions are moderated; purchases and identities are not verified.